Latest Financial Planning News
How $1,000 plus regular contributions turned into $823,000 through compounding
Common sense the best defence against fraudsters: forensic auditor
Investment and economic outlook, August 2025
New report highlights confusion over BDBNs
How ‘investment procrastination’ could be hurting your wealth
ATO warns that SAR lodgments are on its radar
Compassionate release warning issued
The biggest earthquakes in history : (1905–2025)
How financial advice can reduce stress and save time
How personal data could boost your retirement income by up to 50%
Investment and economic outlook, July 2025
ATO flags October SAR lodgment date
Death benefits not reliant on probate
Challenges with TBC increase for those in pension phase
Avoid LRBA structure short cuts
The rise and fall of the world’s largest economies | GDP Epic Battle (1560–2025)
Div 296 sparking death benefit discussions
ATO warns SMSF trustees to be aware of increase in scams
Roles and Responsibilities in a Business Partnership
Beware of tax implications for failing to meet minimum pension requirements: consultant
Leasing property owned by an SMSF
A super contributions deadline you won’t want to miss
How topping up your super each year could leave you $80,000 better off in retirement
Evolution of Boeing - 1916 - 2025
ATO issues guidance on SMSF trustee appointment and compliance
ASIC to increase audit surveillance in 2025–26
Investment and economic outlook, May 2025
Legal case has succession planning lessons for SMSF members, advisers: legal expert
Valuations key to avoiding NALI restrictions

SMSF trustees may find properties within their fund caught under changes to non-arm’s length income rules if the property is involved in a related-party transaction and is not professionally valued, according to a leading SMSF law firm.



       


 


Speaking at a seminar in Sydney on Wednesday, DBA Lawyers’ Shaun Backhaus said it was important that trustees and their advisers not rely on informal valuations from real estate agents if they were acquiring or disposing of a property through a related party.


“When you get the real estate agent’s appraisal, it’s typically going to be a two- or three-line letter saying, ‘Based on my appraisal, the value is this’,” Mr Backhaus said.


“I would bet that half the time, there’s also an email or text message going to your client or, even worse, you, saying, ‘How much do you want me to make this?’ So, I think that’s not really going to cut it.”


Mr Backhaus explained that in disputed cases — such as when there was a suspicion that a property had been acquired from or by a related party at less than market value — the ATO would review the instructions given to the valuer by the trustee or adviser.


If the transaction was found not to have occurred at arm’s length, income earned from the property would be subject to 45 per cent tax as per the new measures currently before parliament.


Even those who had been diligent in their instructions to their real estate agent could be caught if the valuation did not appear to be “based on objective and supportable data” as per the ATO’s guidance on the issue, Mr Backhaus said.


“If there’s an acquisition from a related party and all you’ve got is that agent appraisal and [the value has] shot up later, the ATO could say, ‘No, based on these things in the media which the agent didn’t take into account, the value should have been more’,” he said.


“I recognise clients aren’t going to want to get a $2,000 appraisal very often, but if there are any related-party transactions involved, they need to get a valuation.”


 


Sarah Kendell
14 August 2019
smsfadviser.com


 




20th-September-2019