Latest Financial Planning News
How to budget using the envelope method
Accountants united in support for changes
Investment and economic outlook, October 2025
Stress-test SMSF in preparation for Div 296
Determining what is an in-house asset can help determine investment strategy
Beware pushy sales tactics targeting your super
Call for SMSF ‘nudge’ in DBFO package
How Many Countries Divided From The Largest Empire throughout history
How changes to deeming rates could affect your pension payments
Five building blocks that could lead to a more confident retirement
Investment and economic outlook, September 2025
Caution needed if moving assets to children
Evolution of ‘ageless workers’ sees retirement age rise
Younger Australians expect more for their retirement
New NALE guidance still has issues
Airplane Fuel Consumption Per Minute
How $1,000 plus regular contributions turned into $823,000 through compounding
Common sense the best defence against fraudsters: forensic auditor
Investment and economic outlook, August 2025
New report highlights confusion over BDBNs
How ‘investment procrastination’ could be hurting your wealth
ATO warns that SAR lodgments are on its radar
Compassionate release warning issued
The biggest earthquakes in history : (1905–2025)
How financial advice can reduce stress and save time
How personal data could boost your retirement income by up to 50%
Investment and economic outlook, July 2025
ATO flags October SAR lodgment date
Death benefits not reliant on probate
Challenges with TBC increase for those in pension phase
Avoid LRBA structure short cuts
The rise and fall of the world’s largest economies | GDP Epic Battle (1560–2025)
ATO releases JobKeeper alternative test

The alternative decline in turnover test rules for the JobKeeper payment scheme has now been registered by the ATO.



       


The legislative instrument, Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Alternative Decline in Turnover Test Rules 2020, has now been registered.


The alternative tests will only kick in if an entity cannot satisfy the basic decline in turnover test.
The explanatory statement notes that the alternative tests will only apply to seven circumstances.


These include where an entity commenced business after the relevant comparison period in 2019 or the business did not exist in the relevant comparison period and as a result there was no relevant comparison period in 2019.


It will also cover a circumstance where an entity acquired or disposed of part of their business after the relevant comparison period in 2019, and where an entity has restructured part or all of their business after the relevant comparison period in 2019.


Entities who had an increase in turnover by 50 per cent or more in the 12 months immediately before the applicable turnover test period, or 25 per cent or more in the six months immediately before the applicable turnover test period, or 12.5 per cent or more in the three months immediately before the applicable turnover test period, will also be covered.


The alternative test will also cover entities affected by a drought or other natural disaster in the relevant comparison period in 2019, and entities who have an irregular turnover that is not cyclical, such as what can occur in the building and construction sector.


A sole trader or a small partnership where the sole trader or one of the partners did not work for all or part of the relevant comparison period because they were sick, injured or on leave during the relevant comparison period, and those circumstances affects the turnover of the sole trader or partnership, will also be covered.


Each of the seven circumstances has its own alternative test that is detailed in the legislative instrument.


“The commissioner cannot determine an alternative decline in turnover test in all circumstances,” said the explanatory statement.


“It is only in those circumstances where there is an event or circumstance, be it internal or external to an entity, that is outside the usual business setting for entities of that class which results in the relevant comparison period in 2019 not being appropriate for the purpose of an entity in the class of entities satisfying the decline in turnover test.”


 


Jotham Lian
24 April 2020
smsfadviser.com


 


 




21st-May-2020