Latest Financial Planning News
How $1,000 plus regular contributions turned into $823,000 through compounding
Common sense the best defence against fraudsters: forensic auditor
Investment and economic outlook, August 2025
New report highlights confusion over BDBNs
How ‘investment procrastination’ could be hurting your wealth
ATO warns that SAR lodgments are on its radar
Compassionate release warning issued
The biggest earthquakes in history : (1905–2025)
How financial advice can reduce stress and save time
How personal data could boost your retirement income by up to 50%
Investment and economic outlook, July 2025
ATO flags October SAR lodgment date
Death benefits not reliant on probate
Challenges with TBC increase for those in pension phase
Avoid LRBA structure short cuts
The rise and fall of the world’s largest economies | GDP Epic Battle (1560–2025)
Div 296 sparking death benefit discussions
ATO warns SMSF trustees to be aware of increase in scams
Roles and Responsibilities in a Business Partnership
Beware of tax implications for failing to meet minimum pension requirements: consultant
Leasing property owned by an SMSF
A super contributions deadline you won’t want to miss
How topping up your super each year could leave you $80,000 better off in retirement
Evolution of Boeing - 1916 - 2025
ATO issues guidance on SMSF trustee appointment and compliance
ASIC to increase audit surveillance in 2025–26
Investment and economic outlook, May 2025
Legal case has succession planning lessons for SMSF members, advisers: legal expert
Your 30 June superannuation checklist
Start-ups to suffer under Div 296
Court decides on taxable capital gains distributions

The Federal Court has determined whether trusts that distribute capital gains to non-resident beneficiaries are taxable and will need to be included in their assessable income.



         


The case of Peter Greensill Family Co Pty Ltd (as trustee) v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2020] FCA 559 sought to determine whether the trustee was entitled to disregard its capital gains when it made a foreign resident beneficiary specifically entitled to those gains.


In making the decision, Judge Thawley found that:


  • It was the trustee that made the capital gain.
     
  • The trustee was not a foreign resident, so section 855-10 did not apply to the trustee.
     
  • Section 855-10 also did not apply to the foreign resident beneficiary as the distribution was not a capital gain “from” a CGT event, but a distribution of “amount” equal to the capital gain made by the trustee.

In a blog, Murray Shume of Cooper Grace Ward Lawyers noted the capital gains tax event occurred in relation to shares that were not taxable Australian property.


“Under section 855-10 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, foreign residents are entitled to disregard any capital gain or loss from a CGT event that happens in relation to a CGT asset that is not taxable Australian property,” Mr Shume said.


“In Greensill, Thawley J found that section 855-10 did not apply when foreign beneficiaries were specifically entitled to capital gains from an Australian resident trust. Therefore, the trustee was required to pay tax on the capital gain.”


Mr Shume said the decision has implications for distribution resolutions for the 2020 income year.


“In deciding how to make distributions of capital gains for this income year, trustees should consider the tax consequences of distributing capital gains to non-resident beneficiaries,” Mr Shume said.


 


 


Adrian Flores
25 May 2020
smsfadviser.com


 




16th-June-2020